Cumbria County Council says no to nuclear repository plan

Posted by George Goudie on 30/01/2013
Ennerdale: no underground nuclear storage.

Cumbria County Council's Cabinet has decided that West Cumbria should no longer be considered as a potential location for a deep geological repository to dispose of higher activity radioactive waste.

It was also decided that the two districts of Copeland and Allerdale should be excluded from further consideration in the Government’s Managing Radioactive Waste Safely process. If built, the facility would have contained the most toxic nuclear waste in the UK, some of which is already currently stored above ground at the Sellafield site. 

At a meeting in Carlisle on 30 January, the 10 members of the county council’s Cabinet also agreed that the council will encourage the Government to make the necessary investment to improve the existing surface storage facilities at Sellafield so that there is a more robust surface storage arrangement in the decades to come while the Government finds a permanent solution for the country’s higher activity radioactive waste.

The decision effectively ends Cumbria County Council’s four-year formal involvement in the MRWS process and puts an end to the doubts and concerns of many local people, which have escalated around the crucial decision from the three local authorities of Cumbria County Council, Allerdale Borough Council and Copeland Borough Council on whether to progress to the next stage of allowing the Government to conduct desk-top geological surveys.

As a decision to continue with the process needed the agreement of both the district and county councils, Cumbria County Council’s decision has removed both districts from consideration.

The nuclear industry is, and will continue to be, a key part of the Cumbrian economy. West Cumbria is a world-renowned centre for nuclear skills and expertise and the ‘home’ of the UK’s nuclear industry. Most of the UK’s high-level radioactive waste is stored at Sellafield, and therefore what happens to that waste in the future is, and will continue to be, of vital interest to Cumbria.

Cabinet members made it clear at the meeting that this has been a highly contentious issue which has polarised opinions and that they had listened to and considered all of the evidence and opinions put forward during the MRWS process. This included the report produced by the West Cumbria MRWS Partnership, which as well including the local authorities, included representation from industry, parish councils, the Lake District National Park, the tourist sector, unions and other community groups.

The BMC called on members to sign a petition against the plan

Cath Flitcroft, BMC Access and Conservation Officer, commented:
“This is a sensible decision given the potential impact on the local area and the likely negative impact the development would have had on access to and enjoyment of our National Park.  The BMC is in the process of putting together a Landscape Charter setting out our vision for the protection of those areas most valued by our members, working with those with an interest in conserving our important landscapes to strike a proper balance between development and conservation”.

Cllr Eddie Martin, Leader of Cumbria County Council, said:
“Cabinet believes there is sufficient doubt around the suitability of West Cumbria’s geology to put an end now to the uncertainty and worry this is causing for our communities. Cumbria is not the best place geologically in the UK – the Government’s efforts need to be focused on disposing of the waste underground in the safest place, not the easiest.

“Members have remained concerned throughout on the issue of the legal right of withdrawal if we proceed to the next stage. Despite assurances from Government that they intend to introduce this as primary legislation, we do believe that this could have been done far sooner to ease our concerns. The fact remains the right of withdrawal is not yet enshrined in statute and we could not take the risk of saying yes today without this being absolutely nailed down.

“Cumbria has a unique and world-renowned landscape which needs to be cherished and protected. While Sellafield and the Lake District have co-existed side by side successfully for decades, we fear that if the area becomes known in the national conscience as the place where nuclear waste is stored underground, the Lake District’s reputation may not be so resilient."

Cllr Stewart Young, Deputy Leader of Cumbria County Council, said:
"The case for investment in Sellafield is now more pressing than ever. We had always raised concerns over the lack of any 'plan B' from Government and the fact that West Cumbria was the only area to express an interest in the process left the Government with few options if we decided not to proceed. It is now time for the Government to secure the long-term future of the nuclear industry and put in place robust storage arrangements at Sellafield while it decides how to continue the search for a repository elsewhere in the UK."



« Back

Post a comment Print this article

This article has been read 1257 times

TAGS

Click on the tags to explore more

RELATED ARTICLES

Mynyddoedd Cambria - Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty/Ardal o harddwch naturiol?
0
Mynyddoedd Cambria - Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty/Ardal o harddwch naturiol?

As members of the Alliance for Welsh Designated Landscapes, BMC Cymru was recently invited to share a Senedd petition with members, calling for the Cambrian Mountains region in Mid-Wales to be designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Read more »

Wild Horizons Podcast: Rose Gare-Simmons on Blencathra
0
Wild Horizons Podcast: Rose Gare-Simmons on Blencathra

In the latest episode of Wild Horizons, Rose Gare Simmons tells us all about Blencathra, one of the northernmost fells in the Lake District, majestically overlooking the A66.
Read more »

Podlediad Gorwelion Gwyllt: Gerwyn Jones yn trafod Eifionydd
3
Podlediad Gorwelion Gwyllt: Gerwyn Jones yn trafod Eifionydd

Ardal yng Ngogledd-Orllewin Cymru, yn estyn o Ddwyrain Llŷn yr holl ffordd i Borthmadog, (ac efallai y tu hwnt, dibynnu pwy sy’n cael eu holi) ydi Eifionydd. Mae’r Afon Erch yn ffin Orllewinol iddi. Mae Moel Hebog, Moel y Gest, Moel Lefn a Moel yr Ogof yn rai o’r copaon di-ri sydd werth ymweld â nhw yno.
Read more »

Post a Comment

Posting as Anonymous Community Standards
3000 characters remaining
Submit
Your comment has been posted below, click here to view it
Comments are currently on | Turn off comments
4
Anonymous User
04/02/2013
600 m under ground, you wouldn't have even know it was there......
Anonymous User
20/02/2013
The attitude of the BMC to lobby against this proposal makes me think that I should leave an organisation that allows emotion to overcome logic. If BMC doesn't want the repository in Cumbria where does it propose to place it: just saying "no" is not a solution. The waste exists and has to go somewhere as the current arangements are not suitable for long term storage.
Anonymous User
20/02/2013
As a BMC member and Friend of the Lake District, both long standing, I consider the Cumbria CC's decision to be the correct one. The unknowns about geology and about radioactivity are so great that we cannot risk an easy solution. With our existing nuclear power stations coming to the end of their lives, the increase in storage demand is going to be enormous, we cannot place this burden on the fringe of our most precious lake district. Consider also the proposals for eight new nuclear power stations and this affects the storage needs. Imagine the transport to an underground facility near Sellafield to cope with a huge increase in demand, the security needed, the radioactivity problem in the event of an accident.

After Fukushima we are aware that the commercial reactors will be kept going long after their sell-by date.
Anonymous User
03/03/2013
I agree with a.u.s 1 and 2; the waste needs to be stored somewhere, and if that can be under or near the Sellafield site it will minimise transport of the waste; - not that that would cause any safety problems, just unnecessary extra cost. I can't see the supposed effect on the National Park, as the repository would surely be outside it, as Sellafield is. The Fukushima argument is irrelevant, since current reactor designs address any deficiencies that caused the disastrous events there. Finally, as I understand it, the proposal was not for building a repository, just to conduct a detailed investigation into the feasibility of it, so there was never going to be a firm commitment at this stage to build the repository in Cumbria.

RELATED ARTICLES

Mynyddoedd Cambria - Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty/Ardal o harddwch naturiol?
0

As members of the Alliance for Welsh Designated Landscapes, BMC Cymru was recently invited to share a Senedd petition with members, calling for the Cambrian Mountains region in Mid-Wales to be designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Read more »

Wild Horizons Podcast: Rose Gare-Simmons on Blencathra
0

In the latest episode of Wild Horizons, Rose Gare Simmons tells us all about Blencathra, one of the northernmost fells in the Lake District, majestically overlooking the A66.
Read more »

Podlediad Gorwelion Gwyllt: Gerwyn Jones yn trafod Eifionydd
3

Ardal yng Ngogledd-Orllewin Cymru, yn estyn o Ddwyrain Llŷn yr holl ffordd i Borthmadog, (ac efallai y tu hwnt, dibynnu pwy sy’n cael eu holi) ydi Eifionydd. Mae’r Afon Erch yn ffin Orllewinol iddi. Mae Moel Hebog, Moel y Gest, Moel Lefn a Moel yr Ogof yn rai o’r copaon di-ri sydd werth ymweld â nhw yno.
Read more »

BMC MEMBERSHIP
Join 82,000 BMC members and support British climbing, walking and mountaineering. Membership only £16.97.
Read more »
BMC SHOP
Great range of guidebooks, DVDs, books, calendars and maps.
All with discounts for members.
Read more »
TRAVEL INSURANCE
Get covered with BMC Insurance. Our five policies take you from the beach to Everest.
Read more »