Issue 51: A question of funding

Just how is the BMC funded?
Gone are the days when you could run an organisation like the BMC from a dusty backroom with a single filing cabinet. Representing a touch over 65,000 members and employing 25 full-time staff, the modern BMC gets through about £1.75m a year. Some of this goes towards running the office. But most of it goes toward the activities that people join us for: keeping crags open, safety and equipment advice, lobbying important people to nip problems in the bud, liability insurance for members, running events, marketing, producing a website and Summit magazine to tell everyone about it.
So where does this million-and-threequarters actually come from? Well, the 2007 Annual Accounts show that last year 59% of the income needed to run the BMC came from membership subscriptions, 30% from trading activities (including travel insurance), and a slim 11% from Sports Council grants.
The figures are healthy. Membership is growing – an 8.4% increase in the last year – probably down to our new membership database starting to generate new marketing possibilities and the recent very successful Direct Debit offer. The 30% of income from trading activities (including the online shop and various events) is on track too, but we’re not resting on our laurels. We’ve just completely overhauled the online travel insurance application process and are about to launch a revamped online shop.
It’s the smallest slice of the pie chart that causes the most confusion: most people think that the BMC is plugged into some huge source of government cash, but sadly this isn’t true. However this does mean that compared to many other national sports bodies we’re actually in a very good situation. The majority are heavily reliant on government support – up to 95% in some cases – to run their operations. This brings with it all the inherent insecurity and uncertainty of short-term funding commitments and the knock on effects of personnel or policy changes within government and its department. Fortunately we’re largely immune to the sort of pressures faced by other bodies, and can concentrate on simply representing climbers, hill walkers and mountaineers.
We used to get some funding from UK Sport, their focus is on elite performance and Olympic sport; previously they supported elite performance in mountaineering via the BMC expedition grants, and Mountain Leader Training at a UK level. But over the past three years they’ve completely turned their back on climbing and mountaineering to concentrate on medal-winning Olympic sports.
Our current government funding comes from Sport England – their focus is different to UK Sport – their aim is to make England more active by encouraging more people to get involved in sport. So right now we’re filling in lots of headache-inducing forms for the next four-year cycle of applying for some cash to put towards clubs, volunteers, high-performance and mountain training.
But who decides how the money is spent? In the case of any funding from Sport England, they decide – and funding is ring-fenced and continuing targets must be met. And in the case of the other money, the membership cash, the insurance profits, then that’s decided by a mindboggling process involving the National Council, the Executive Committee and the Finance Committee, directly influenced by priorities identified at BMC Area Meetings. We’re in the process of producing the new four-year strategy for the BMC, the grandly named, ‘Strategic Plan 2009 – 2013’, and that will be available for comment on the website very soon. It’s your money – tell us what you’d like to see it spent on.
What should BMC funding priorities be?
Let us know – email summit@thebmc.co.uk/






