It was with dismay that I learnt that the BMC chose not to make any expression of concern to the UIAA about the shooting of the Tibetan nun in September 2006, as investigated by Ed Douglas in Summit 44. I initially raised the matter at my February area meeting, where it was thought that the BMC should complain to the appropriate authorities - the UIAA. I also introduced the item at the AGM Open Forum, only to be met with a stunned silence. Yet in 1992 the BMC, along with the Chinese Mountaineering Federation, signed the UIAA Kathmandu Declaration. This is nine separate statements of ethical objectives, including “respect for cultural heritage”. At the Open Forum it was quite apparent that quite a few, both on the top table and on the floor, were quite unaware of the Declaration. But thanks to the efforts of my area rep, National Council did discuss the matter in April, and decided to seek some information from Amnesty International – although why it was necessary to approach them is beyond me, the Ed Douglas article was comprehensive enough. In September the Council discussed the matter once more, and again decided to “re-approach Amnesty for an update”. Amnesty replied on November 5th, too late to raise the matter at the October Assembly of the UIAA. I was not seeking to start WW3, merely an expression to the Assembly of concern, yet it seems to me that putting your signature to an international document counts for nothing in the BMC. In his article Ed Douglas asked the question “do mountaineers care?” The answer is obvious.
K.C. Gordon, Summit 49